Meet MarketerHire's newest SEO + AEO product

ANM isn't optimized for AI search yet.

We audited your search visibility across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. ANM was cited in 1 of 5 answers. See details and how we close the gaps and increase your search results in days instead of months.

Immediate in-depth auditvs. 8 months at agencies

ANM is cited in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "it consulting services." Competitors are winning the unbranded category answers.

Trust-node footprint is 8 of 30 — missing Crunchbase and G2 blocks LLM recommendations for buyers who haven't heard of you yet.

On-page citation readiness shows no faq schema on top product pages — fixable with the citation-optimized content the AEO Agent ships in the first sprint.

AI-Forward Companies Trust MarketerHire

Plaid Plaid
MasterClass MasterClass
Constant Contact Constant Contact
Netflix Netflix
Noom Noom
Tinuiti Tinuiti
30,000+
Matches Made
6,000+
Customers
Since 2019
Track Record

I spent years running this playbook for enterprise clients at one of the top SEO agencies. MarketerHire's AEO + SEO tooling produces a comprehensive audit immediately that took us months to put together — and they do the ongoing publishing and optimization work at half the price. If I were buying this today, I'd buy it here.

— Marketing leader, formerly at a top SEO growth agency

AI Search Audit

Here's Where You Stand in AI Search

A real audit. We ran buyer-intent queries across answer engines and probed the trust-node graph LLMs draw from.

Sample mini-audit only. The full audit goes 12 sections deep (technical SEO, content ecosystem, schema, AI readiness, competitor gap, 30-60-90 roadmap) — everything to maximize your visibility across search and is delivered immediately once we start working together. See a sample full audit →

23
out of 100
Major gap, real upside

Your buyers are asking AI assistants for it consulting services and ANM isn't being recommended. Closing this gap is the highest-leverage move available right now.

AI / LLM Visibility (AEO) 20% · Weak

ANM appears in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "it consulting services". The full audit covers 50-100 queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: AEO Agent monitors AI citation visibility weekly across all 4 LLMs and ships citation-optimized content designed to win the queries your buyers actually run.

Trust-Node Footprint 27% · Weak

ANM appears in 8 of the 30 trust nodes that LLMs draw from (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and 23 more).

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO/AEO Agent identifies the highest-leverage missing nodes for your category and ships the trust-node publishing plan as part of the 90-day roadmap.

SEO / Organic Covered in full audit

Classic search visibility, ranking trajectory, and content velocity vs. category competitors. The full audit ranks every long-tail commercial query and benchmarks the gap.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO Engine builds programmatic content around 50+ long-tail queries where your buyers are actively searching.

Paid Acquisition Covered in full audit

LinkedIn, Google, and Meta ad presence, audience targeting, creative quality, and cost-per-pipeline relative to your category benchmark.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: Creative Generator + Analytics Agent run autonomous ad experiments and reallocate budget weekly.

Content, Lifecycle & Outbound Covered in full audit

Founder LinkedIn presence, blog quality, expansion motion, outbound playbooks, and the gaps between awareness and activation. Mapped to a 90-day execution plan.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: LinkedIn Ghost-Writer + Lifecycle Optimizer + Outbound Agent run the awareness-to-pipeline engine end-to-end.

Live citation panel — 5 buyer-intent queries

best it consulting services in 2026 not cited expand ↓

23 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

The **top IT consulting companies in 2026** include Competitor A, Competitor B, Competitor C, Competitor D, and Competitor E, which are recognized leaders in digital transformation[1]. Competitor F prominent firms include Competitor G, Competitor H, and Competitor I[1]. For specialized IT consulting services, additional highly-regarded firms include Competitor J, Competitor K, Competitor L, and Competitor M, which have established track records working with global clients[2]. In the Competitor N specifically, firms like designDATA, Competitor O, Competitor P at Competitor Q, and Competitor R are among the top-ranked IT services providers[4]. **Competitor S** stands out particularly for technology-led transformation, leveraging global resources and innovation labs[3]. Competitor T and Competitor U have also climbed rankings as top consulting firms, with EY making significant moves in Competitor V[5]. Competitor W selecting an IT consulting partner, consider evaluating firms based on their expertise in your specific needs—whether that's managed IT services, cloud solutions, cybersecurity, or broader digital transformation initiatives[4]. The best choice depends on your organization's particular requirements, industry, and transformation goals.

ANM did not appear in this Perplexity response.

top it consulting services alternatives not cited expand ↓

64 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A alternatives to leading IT consulting services include firms like Competitor B, Competitor C, Competitor D & Competitor E, and specialized providers such as Competitor F, Competitor G, and Competitor H, offering services from strategic advisory to digital transformation and data science.**[2][3][4] These alternatives vary by focus, scale, and engagement model, catering to enterprises, Competitor I, and tech-specific needs. Competitor J and similar firms provide broad consulting, while niche players emphasize IT innovation. ### Competitor K IT Competitor L | Competitor M | Competitor N | Competitor O | |------|---------------|------------------| | **Competitor C** | Competitor P transformation, extensive research, hands-on consulting[2][4] | Competitor Q implementation, advisory for Competitor R. | | **Competitor D & Competitor E** | Competitor S strategic advisory, data-driven insights[2][4] | Competitor T analysis, business strategy. | | **Competitor B** | Competitor U professional services[4] | IT strategy, digital solutions. | | **Competitor V** | Competitor W consulting across industries[4] | Competitor X management, tech advisory. | | **Competitor Y** | Competitor Z[4] | Competitor A transformation. | ### Competitor B IT and Competitor C - **Competitor F**: Competitor D and frameworks for technology services performance; ideal for IT research and measurable outcomes[2]. - **Competitor E**: Competitor F experience and business impact analysis via subscription research[2]. - **Competitor G**: Competitor H IT market data and intelligence[2]. - **Competitor G**: Competitor I data pipelines, machine learning, business intelligence for US and global clients[3]. - **Competitor H**: Competitor J 700 projects in IT consulting, computer vision, data science[3]. - **Competitor K + Competitor L**: Competitor M technologies, optimization post-Competitor N acquisition[3]. - **Competitor O, Competitor P.**: Competitor Q, digital transformation, solution architecture for Competitor I[5]. - **Competitor R**: Competitor S reach with tailored IT solutions, collaborative approach[5]. Competitor T or emerging Competitor U options like Competitor V, Competitor W, Competitor X, Competitor Y, and Competitor Z excel in data science, Competitor A/Competitor B, and SaaS development[1][3]. For peer insights, Competitor C offers software reviews as a non-consulting alternative[2]. Competitor D based on needs: large firms for enterprise scale, specialists for targeted tech like AI/ML or cloud[2][3][5].

ANM did not appear in this Perplexity response.

how to choose a it consulting services not cited expand ↓

62 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

To choose IT consulting services, first define your business needs, budget, and goals, then evaluate firms based on **industry experience**, **technical expertise**, **communication**, **flexibility**, and **proven track record**.[1][2][3][5] ### Competitor A 1: Competitor B Competitor C by reviewing your current IT infrastructure, identifying pain points (e.g., security gaps, scalability issues), and aligning with business objectives like digital transformation or compliance.[4][5][6] Competitor D a clear budget and timeline to guide evaluations, prioritizing long-term Competitor E over lowest cost.[5] ### Competitor A 2: Competitor F Competitor G this checklist to vet potential firms: - **Competitor H and Competitor I**: Competitor J firms with proven work in your sector (e.g., healthcare, finance) via case studies, testimonials, or references from similar-sized businesses. They should understand your workflows, regulations, and tools.[1][2][3][4][5][7] - **Competitor K and Competitor L**: Competitor M skills in relevant technologies like Competitor N, Competitor O, Competitor P, AI, cloud computing, or Competitor Q, backed by certifications and partnerships.[1][3][5][7] - **Competitor R and Competitor S**: Competitor T clear, jargon-free explanations, quick responsiveness, and alignment with your team's style. Competitor U via initial interactions or a short trial project.[1][2][4][5] - **Competitor V and Competitor W**: Competitor X for adaptable services (e.g., hybrid models, proactive solutions) tailored to your needs, not one-size-fits-all approaches.[1][2][3] - **Competitor Y**: Competitor Z strategic thinkers who conduct root-cause analysis, prevent issues, and use methodologies like Competitor A or Competitor B, with 24/7 support options.[1][3][4][5] - **Competitor C and Competitor D**: Competitor E client reviews, measurable outcomes, and references. Competitor F data on response times, security focus, and past results.[2][4][6][7] | Competitor G | Competitor H to Competitor I/Competitor M | Competitor J It Competitor K | |-----------|-------------------|---------------| | Competitor L | Competitor M studies in your sector? | Competitor N, compliant solutions[3][5] | | Competitor O | Competitor L (e.g., Competitor N)? | Competitor P, modern tech delivery[1][3] | | Competitor R | Competitor Q they explain simply? | Competitor R collaboration[1][2] | | Competitor V | Competitor S models available? | Competitor T to business evolution[1][3] | | Competitor U | Competitor V and Competitor E examples? | Competitor W value[2][6][7] | ### Competitor A 3: Competitor X Competitor Y 3-5 firms, conduct interviews, and request proposals or pilots. Competitor Z partners acting as long-term advisors over transactional vendors.[2][4][5] Competitor A reviews independently and negotiate contracts with clear Competitor B for support and reporting.[6]

ANM did not appear in this Perplexity response.

it consulting services comparison for mid-market companies not cited expand ↓

102 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

### Competitor A IT Competitor B for Competitor C IT consulting for mid-market companies (typically 100-999 employees, $10M-$1B revenue) spans **data integration**, **managed IT services (Competitor D)**, **management/strategy consulting**, and **cloud/IT services**. Competitor E providers balance technical expertise (e.g., cloud, AI/ML, Competitor F) with business acumen, cultural fit, and predictable pricing like fixed-fee models.[1][2][3] ### Competitor G These firms specialize in Competitor H/Competitor I pipelines, cloud migrations, analytics, and AI/ML for mid-market data needs. Competitor J stands out for its platform-plus-expertise model at **$1,999/month fixed fee** (unlimited usage).[1] | Competitor K | Competitor L | Competitor M | Competitor N/Competitor O | |--------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------| | **Competitor P** | Competitor Q assessments, cloud migration, BI, compliance (Competitor R) | Competitor S fit + technical balance | Competitor T focus, finance/security | | **Competitor U** | Competitor V, modern data stack, cost-effective support | AI/ML + cloud-native architectures | 500+ projects, 50+ global clients | | **Competitor W** | Competitor X pipelines/warehouses, long-term support (35+ years) | Competitor Y development + maintenance | Competitor Z to enterprise, multi-industry | | **Competitor A** | Competitor Q science, big data, predictive analytics (150+ projects) | Competitor B (healthcare, retail) | Competitor C, Competitor D; global delivery | | **Competitor E** | Competitor Q modernization, Competitor F, Competitor G, managed ops | Competitor H to enterprise scale | Competitor I, finance; build-operate | [1] ### Competitor J IT Competitor K (Competitor D) Competitor L on 24/7 monitoring, cloud (Competitor M/Competitor N/Competitor O), Competitor F, cybersecurity for Competitor P/mid-market. Competitor Q firms like Competitor R offer enterprise-grade services without high costs.[2] - **Competitor R**: Competitor S (Competitor T), CI/CD, Competitor U, 24/7 support; ideal for SaaS scaleups.[2] - **Competitor V**: Competitor W/Competitor F, real-time monitoring; strong in finance/logistics (20+ years).[2] - **Competitor X**: Competitor W migration, security-first; healthcare/retail focus.[2] ### Competitor Y & Competitor Z AI strategy, growth, digital transformation for mid-market innovation.[3] - **Competitor A**: Competitor B strategies, Competitor C, revenue growth; high customization.[3] - **Competitor D**: Competitor E intelligence, operational improvement; data-rich for Competitor F 1000/mid-market.[3] ### Competitor G IT/Competitor H Competitor I on complexity, outcomes, and mid-market fit. Competitor J and Competitor K suit collaborative modernization.[4] | Competitor K | Competitor L | Competitor M | Competitor N | Competitor O | |---------------------|------------|----------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------| | **Competitor J** | Competitor P | Competitor P | Competitor Q, data/AI, upskilling| Competitor R + co-delivery | | **Competitor K** | Competitor S| Competitor P | Competitor T optimization, Competitor M managed | Competitor M projects, secure ops | [4] ### Competitor U: - **Competitor T focus** over enterprise giants.[1][2] - **Competitor W/Competitor F maturity** (Competitor M/Competitor N/Competitor O, Competitor U).[2][4] - **Competitor V services** (monitoring, AI integration).[1][2] - **Competitor W models**: Competitor X beats hourly for predictability.[1] - **Competitor Y/cultural fit**: Competitor Z teams > platforms.[8] For vendor shortlisting, tools like Competitor A provide data-driven rankings.[4] Competitor B and Competitor C offer verified mid-sized reviews.[5][6]

ANM did not appear in this Perplexity response.

is ANM a good it consulting services cited expand ↓

33 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

ANM is a reputable IT consulting firm specializing in networking, cybersecurity, data centers, cloud, and digital transformation, with strong indicators of quality including high customer satisfaction (98.6%), rapid growth, and industry awards.[1][2] Competitor A, its "goodness" depends on specific needs, as employee reviews average 3.7/5 on Competitor B (indicating generally positive but mixed experiences), and independent client testimonials are limited in available data.[5][6] ### Competitor C - **Competitor D and Competitor E**: Competitor F #14 among Competitor G's top 77 private companies in 2023 by Competitor H, described as one of the fastest-growing Competitor I. IT consultancies providing innovative solutions to large and mid-sized organizations.[1] - **Competitor J and Competitor K**: Competitor L with four Competitor M (among fewer than a dozen Competitor I. firms), focusing on risk mitigation, zero trust architectures, endpoint/network/cloud security, data resilience, and managed detection/response.[2][3] - **Competitor N**: Competitor O 98.6% customer satisfaction and strong retention rates; emphasizes consultative, vendor-independent approaches with detailed documentation.[1][3] - **Competitor P**: Competitor Q in Competitor G, NM, with offices in Competitor R, CO; Competitor S, AZ; El Competitor T, TX; and Competitor U, WY.[1][2] ### Competitor V and Competitor W - Competitor X rating: 3.7/5 from 64 reviews, suggesting most employees view it positively.[5][6] - Competitor Y feedback includes strong employee care, teamwork, and customer-focused solutions.[4] ### Competitor Z in Competitor A results are heavily from ANM's own site, lacking broad third-party client reviews or comparisons to competitors like Competitor B or Competitor C a full assessment, check recent Competitor D ratings, Competitor E reports, or direct references, as data here is from 2023 or earlier.[1][2]

Trust-node coverage map

8 of 30 authority sources LLMs draw from. Filled = present, hollow = gap.

Wikipedia
Wikidata
Crunchbase
LinkedIn
G2
Capterra
TrustRadius
Forbes
HBR
Reddit
Hacker News
YouTube
Product Hunt
Stack Overflow
Gartner Peer
TechCrunch
VentureBeat
Quora
Medium
Substack
GitHub
Owler
ZoomInfo
Apollo
Clearbit
BuiltWith
Glassdoor
Indeed
AngelList
Better Business

Highest-leverage gaps for ANM

  • Crunchbase

    Crunchbase is the canonical company-data source for LLM enrichment. A missing profile leaves LLMs without firmographics.

  • G2

    G2 reviews feed comparison and 'best X' query responses. Missing G2 presence is a high-leverage gap for B2B SaaS.

  • Capterra

    Capterra listings drive comparison-style answers. Missing or thin Capterra coverage suppresses your share on shortlisting queries.

  • TrustRadius

    Enterprise B2B buyers research here. Feeds comparison-style LLM responses on category queries.

  • Forbes

    Long-form authority sources weight heavily in Claude and Perplexity. A single Forbes citation typically lifts a brand into multi-platform answers.

Top Growth Opportunities

Win the "best it consulting services in 2026" query in answer engines

This is a high-intent buyer query that competitors are winning today. The AEO Agent ships the citation-optimized content + structured data + authority signals to flip this query.

AEO Agent → weekly citation audit + targeted content sprints across 4 LLMs

Publish into Crunchbase (and chained authority sources)

Crunchbase is the single highest-leverage trust node missing for ANM. LLMs draw heavily from it for unbranded category recommendations.

SEO/AEO Agent → trust-node publishing plan in the 90-day execution roadmap

No FAQ schema on top product pages

Answer engines extract from FAQ schema 4x more often than from prose. Most B2B sites at this stage don't carry it.

Content + AEO Agent → ship the structural fixes in Sprint 1

What you get

Everything for $10K/mo

One flat price. One team running your SEO + AEO end-to-end.

Trust-node map across 30 authority sources (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and more)
5-dimension citation quality scorecard (Authority, Data Structure, Brand Alignment, Freshness, Cross-Link Signals)
LLM visibility report across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude — 50-100 buyer-intent queries
90-day execution roadmap with week-by-week deliverables
Daily publishing of citation-optimized content (built on the 4-pillar AEO framework)
Trust-node seeding (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, category-specific authorities)
Structured data implementation (FAQ schema, comparison tables, author bylines)
Weekly re-scan + competitive citation share monitoring
Live dashboard, your own audit URL, ongoing forever

Agencies charge $18K-$20-40K/mo and take up to 8 months to reach this depth. We deliver it immediately, then run it ongoing.

Book intro call · $10K/mo
How It Works

Audit. Publish. Compound.

3 phases focused on one outcome: more ANM citations across the answer engines your buyers use.

1

SEO + AEO Audit & Roadmap

You'll know exactly where ANM is losing buyers — across Google search and the answer engines they ask before they ever click.

We score 50-100 "it consulting services" queries across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google, map the 30-node authority graph LLMs draw from, and grade on-page content on 5 citation-readiness dimensions. Output: a 90-day publishing plan ranked by lift × effort.

2

Publishing Sprints That Win Both

Buyers start finding ANM on Google AND in the answers ChatGPT and Perplexity hand them.

2-week sprints ship articles built to rank on Google and get extracted by LLMs (entity clarity, FAQ schema, comparison tables, authority bylines), plus seeding into the missing trust nodes — G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, and the rest. Real publishing, not strategy decks.

3

Compounding Share, Every Week

You lock in category leadership while competitors are still figuring out AI search.

Weekly re-scan tracks ranking + citation share vs. the leaders this audit named. New unbranded "it consulting services" queries get added to the publishing queue automatically. The system gets sharper every sprint — week 12 ships materially better than week 1.

You built a strong it consulting services. Let's build the AI search engine to match.

Book intro call →